Forum Thread
(Lake Martin Specific)
103,192 messages
Updated 10/22/2017 10:54:58 PM
Lakes Online Forum
50,896 messages
Updated 10/23/2017 2:36:34 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,874 messages
Updated 10/9/2017 7:29:28 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
3,998 messages
Updated 9/28/2017 10:12:56 PM
Lakes Online Forum
3,797 messages
Updated 10/16/2017 6:05:46 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,143 messages
Updated 8/26/2017 8:18:18 PM
Lakes Online Forum
2,867 messages
Updated 10/12/2017 11:04:26 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
160 messages
Updated 7/14/2017 9:45:06 AM
Lakes Online Forum
64 messages
Updated 7/25/2017 1:09:38 AM
Lake Martin Photo Gallery

    
    Back | Search | Photos | News | Chat | Topics Forum

Name:   Searay240 - Email Member Reply
Subject:   It's not over yet
Date:   2/19/2016 12:44:04 PM   IP ADDRESS: 140.32.107.150

Just saw this posted on the FERC website. Hopefully AP will not have to revert back to the old rule curve until the rehearing process is over. 

 

                                                UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                               FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

 

 

Alabama Power Company                                                                 Project No. 349-185

           

                                                                                                         

           

ORDER GRANTING REHEARINGS FOR

FURTHER CONSIDERATION

                                                            

(February 16, 2016)

 

Rehearings have been timely requested of the Commission’s order issued on December 17, 2015, in this proceeding. Alabama Power Company, 153 FERC ¶ 61,298 (2015). In the absence of Commission action within 30 days from the date the rehearing requests were filed, the request for rehearing (and any timely requests for rehearing filed subsequently)[1] would be deemed denied. 18 C.F.R. § 385.713 (2015).

            In order to afford additional time for consideration of the matters raised or to be raised, rehearing of the Commission’s order is hereby granted for the limited purpose of further consideration, and timely-filed rehearing requests will not be deemed denied by operation of law. Rehearing requests of the above-cited order filed in this proceeding will be addressed in a future order. As provided in 18 C.F.R. § 385.713(d), no answers to the rehearing requests will be entertained.

 

 

                                                                                   

 

 

 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

 

 

[1] See San Diego Gas & Electric Company v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services into Markets Operated by the California Independent System Operator and the California Power Exchange, et al., 95 FERC ¶ 61,173 (2001) (Clarifying that a single tolling order applies to all rehearing requests that were timely filed).





Name:   btexpress - Email Member Reply
Subject:   It's not over yet
Date:   2/20/2016 2:03:54 PM   IP ADDRESS: 99.125.101.242

     Sad, but I'm sure that more money will be spent to satisfy a few.  I think this is why so many people like Donald Trump et type tuff  talk.  Now, if he could actually deliver on the tuff talk.







    Back | Search | Photos | News | Chat | Topics Forum


Quick Links
Lake Martin News
Lake Martin Photos
Lake Martin Videos

About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LakeMartin.com
THE LAKE MARTIN WEBSITE

Copyright 2017, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal