Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	The MOST convincing Roger Stone indictment
Date:	1/27/2019 4:17:43 PM

After his arrest but before he gave is indignant courthouse remarks to the media, before he raised his hands in a Nixon salute, before he gave any interviews to FOX, CNN or any broadcast network, he called and was interviewed by his good buddy Alex Jones!!

I rest my case!!

Name:	Carlson -	Reply
Subject:	The MOST convincing Roger Stone indictment
Date:	1/27/2019 4:32:40 PM

Only thing you can rest is your DTS!  Wow, you must be miserable with Trump in office.  

Give it a rest dude.

Name:	Shortbus -	Reply
Subject:	The MOST convincing Roger Stone indictment
Date:	1/27/2019 5:14:50 PM

https://www.infowars.com/infowars-lands-in-florida-to-get-exclusive-story-on-roger-stone-political-witch-hunt/

Name:	Lifer -	Reply
Subject:	Wow! Absolutely shocking
Date:	1/27/2019 7:54:47 PM

Shocking I say. How could he. Who would have thought he would call the media company he works with as a contributor to give an interview. I had my doubts about his guilt but now that I know this I'm absolutely sure he must be guilty.

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	Wow! Absolutely shocking
Date:	1/27/2019 11:03:44 PM (updated 1/27/2019 11:04:46 PM)

that anybody including Lifer could consider ''Info Wars'' worthy of being called ''Media''!  Alex Jones and Info Wars is not what anybody that is not certifiably insane would consider a legitimate news sources!

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	Wow! Absolutely shocking
Date:	1/27/2019 11:52:33 PM

 I think former US Attorney Christie is somewhat more believable than Info Wars.

Former New Jersey governor and ABC news contributor Chris Christie called special counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of longtime Trump friend Roger Stone "pretty damning."

"Listen, I think if he decides to go to trial, he's in very, very grave danger," Christie, a former U.S. attorney, told George Stephanopoulos on "This Week”.

"Everyone is presumed innocent, and so is he, but the indictment, I think, is a pretty damning indictment," he said.

Name:	Buteye -	Reply
Subject:	The MOST convincing Roger Stone indictment
Date:	1/28/2019 12:17:31 AM

Definitely a very "profound" little paragraph. To me the most important part says "the Government cannot give to anybody anything that the Government does not first take from somebody else". The key point is "you cannot multiply wealth by dividing it".

Name:	Lifer -	Reply
Subject:	Learn English sometime
Date:	1/28/2019 7:07:49 AM

I said media company. I dint put any other qualifier with it. Whether you consider it legit is up to you. Don't put words in my text.

You and goofy constantly cite CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC et AL as "legitimate" media, yet they constantly have to retract stories  that prove to be false. I don't listen to or read Alex Jones or info wars but they are a media company.

Note for the uninformed aka archie - media does not mean news and certainly doesn't mean legitimate.

Name:	CRD -	Reply
Subject:	Wow! Absolutely shocking
Date:	1/28/2019 11:47:37 AM

I would value Andrew McCarthey's opinion over Christie's and he states just the opposite.

Name:	Buteye -	Reply
Subject:	Learn to spell sometime!
Date:	1/29/2019 1:45:47 PM

What is the "intent" of this post?  Are you not aware that many of the post that you make contains one or more misspelled words? I thought from a previous discussion on this subject that we had "moved" beyond having our "posts" graded for spelling.

Name:	Lifer -	Reply
Subject:	Sad archie
Date:	1/29/2019 3:34:13 PM (updated 1/29/2019 3:38:26 PM)

If that is the worst insult you can come up with, which it must be since you constantly fall back on it, then you are dumber than I think. Which is really sad because havknown for years now that your IQ doesn't reach triple digits. Now I am certain it doesn't reach room temperature. You obviously can't tell the difference between typos and spelling errors.

I have repeatedly admitted to being a horrible speller and thumb typing creates plenty of typos for me. Not to mention touch screens and I don't get along well. So try another insult sometimes, this one is getting boring.

Should I mention moot VS. mute Archie.

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	Lifer
Date:	1/29/2019 8:13:31 PM

Please give me the date of this ''moot/mute'' post that has kept your knickers in a Knot for an unhealthy period of time.  I vaguely remember the discussion but I sure don't remember it being something so egregious that it would put a reasonably mentally balanced individual in such a funk for months on end! 

Name:	Lifer -	Reply
Subject:	Lifer
Date:	1/30/2019 6:59:38 AM

Yes we tend to try to forget embarrassing moments. Do your own damn research. I'm not in a funk about it. I use it to ontinuallybpoint out just how dumb you are but for thosethat missed it I will explain. I made a post and stated something was a moot point so you in all your normal condescention pointed out that it ispelled mute not moot.

You really need to stop projecting your anger onto others.

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	Thanks Lifer
Date:	1/31/2019 8:11:34 AM (updated 1/31/2019 8:22:26 AM)

for yet another post pointing out how dumb I am by reinforcing how stupid you are! Learn to spell and to be more patient!

BTW:  I have looked for the post and cannot find it...guess you deleted it as soon as you realized as stated in your own post above it was you that ''mis-spelled moot'' by using using ''mute'' instead.  I pointed out that the correct word for your point was ''moot'', not ''mute''.  That being the case, for the life of me I can't see what got your panties in a wad.

Now, you continue to stew on it til it warms every ventrical of your cold 6th grade heart...I'm moving on with trying to get out the truths that prove a mad-man is intentionally destroying the greatest nation on earth.

Name:	Lifer -	Reply
Subject:	You are a lying sack of sh!t
Date:	1/31/2019 8:49:50 AM

Nice try at revisionist history dumbass. The entire thread is still up. I read it yesterday. You are just to stupid to do a search. I stated that something was moot point, meaning insignificant, not important or germane to the discussion. You responded with "it is spelled mute". Then I corrected you. I also used the term diatribe in the thread. You then tried to mock me for the improper use of that word also, just reinforcing just how ignorant you really are. I'm sure you had to look the term up because you cut and paste selective edits to prove I was wrong focusing on it being deemed an archaic word. Then defining archaic as "old timey".  If I could cut a paste to the forum I would, for others not for you. But for those with IQ's above room temperature I have included several terms in this post that can be searched and bring up the thread instantly. It happened on a thread posted Sept. 23-24 ,2016.

Therein lies the proof that not only are you an idiot, but a lying sack of sh!t to boot.

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	Good Lord Lifer
Date:	1/31/2019 7:01:30 PM

Against my better judgement I read every single one of your post for Sept 23 and 24 2016 to reread the infamous ''mute'' vs ''moot'' post.  Guess what?  It ain't there sweetheart.

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	No lifer
Date:	2/2/2019 9:10:37 AM

A liar is somebody who claims they said something they didn't!  That makes you are either a liar, as well as stupid, because the specific comment you cliam to have made on a certain date or dates was not actually made on those dates, based on the evidence you yourself provided, or were made then deleted. 

You are a liar and stupid and mentally off!  I am finished with this BS!  You are the only person I have ever muted on this forum.  I removed the mute but it goes back on now.  You need to get help, seriously, for the safety of yourself and those around you.

Name:	Lifer -	Reply
Subject:	No lifer
Date:	2/2/2019 10:10:00 AM

Great! Now that you have me "muted" I know how to make almost everybody mute to you. This will be real fun because either you will be virtually alone or proven a liar once again. Hmm, wonder which it will be.

I read the whole thread again yesterday as I'm sure others have also.