Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	"Special Prosecutor" to look at Trump probe origin
Date:	5/14/2019 9:18:19 AM

So not really a special prosecutor but close enough to look into the origins of the probe of the Trump campaign.  This on the heels of the IG report which is supposedly going to be released some time in June.  I think they also need to examine the Clinton email system investigation since the more we learn about it the more disturbing the picture becomes.  IMO the former was an abuse of power and the latter was a sham investigation bordering on a coverup.  We will see what all these investigations turn up but I suspect that there are a number of very nervous people from the Obama admin, especially Comey, McCabe, Clapper, Brennan, Baker, Yates and many others.  The question is if there was illegalities, will anyone break and if so, who will it be?  Usually the strategy is to offer a deal to the first one that comes clean and then you fry the rest.  That is an awful strong temptation if there were improprieties and none if there weren't.

On a related note, Rosenstein is already on the speaking circuit flaming Comey.  He actually called Comey a "political pundit", which by all appearances he was that when head of the FBI although I would have added partisan to that nom de plume.  Clapper and Brennan are of similar ilk.  What is interesting is that these latter two maroons do not seem to be the darling of the resistence media lately.  I suspect their legal counsel has told them to shut their traps but it is also likely they are no longer useful idiots to the media any longer.

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	And so it begins...Brennan v. Comey
Date:	5/16/2019 12:28:47 PM

This has the potential to be the beginning of the end with Brennan and Comey pointing fingers at each other about the phony Steele dossier.  And Trey Gowdy is out there saying that in terms of this finger pointing battle the email exchanges favor Comey's side of the story.  Doesn't help Comey because he signed FISA warrants that relied on opposition campaign material that was unverified (even to this day) and used press stories that they caused as secondary rationale for the warrant.  So regardless of who pushed the dossier, both of them are culpable.  And it also appears that they briefed dear leader so he is possibly tainted.

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	What, no inappropriate content flag?!?!?
Date:	5/16/2019 4:37:29 PM

I am so disappointed that the idiot that flags every one of my posts hasn't done so yet.  C'mon, you asleep at the wheel?

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	Now it's Comey v. Lynch
Date:	5/21/2019 8:14:57 AM

So one of them committed perjury....either Lynch told Comey to call the Clinton email investigation a matter and she committed perjury or Comey lied under oath.  One of them lied under oath, that much is clear.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Now it's Comey v. Lynch
Date:	5/21/2019 8:32:00 AM

To borrow from the warts on the site - "Why did they lie?"  "What do they have to hide?"  "Why would they not welcome an investigation to clear them if they were innocent?"  "This is not how the innocent act"

Orville better start harvesting some more corn because this is going to be a show.