Name:	MrHodja -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions v Tuberville
Date:	3/4/2020 10:56:33 AM

It doesn't look like Trump will ease up on Sessions, so even if he were elected he would be considered "damaged goods".  Tuberville, if elected, at least would come in with a clean slate, and thus I will most likely vote for him in the runoff.  That being said, I would be interested in other views on the situation (except for disgruntled Tide fans, lol).

Name:	lucky67 -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions v Tuberville
Date:	3/4/2020 11:49:57 AM

jeff would need a life jacket in Washington--damaged goods is correct--althought he would be 110% loyal NOW-but i havent forgotten his embarrassing exit as AG

Name:	lakngulf -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions v Tuberville
Date:	3/4/2020 12:46:17 PM

I fully agree with Trump that Jeff made it too easy for Dems to play out the Russian hoax. 

But memo to djtrump "enough already"

Name:	Talullahhound -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions v Tuberville
Date:	3/4/2020 8:15:05 PM

Has nothing to do with sports - but I couldn't bring myself to vote for Tuberville.  Sessions is damaged goods, but, McConnell would keep him from harm's way.  Not to insult anyone here, but Tuberville just seems stupid to me.

Name:	wix -	Reply
Subject:	TUBBIE
Date:	3/5/2020 5:29:59 PM

Considering your last sentence, TUBBIE will fit right in with the whole world of swampee’s.