Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	More bad news for leftists...May job numbers
Date:	6/5/2020 10:05:28 AM (updated 6/5/2020 10:50:52 AM)

The recovery has begun and we added 2.5M jobs in May, including over 300K in the health care industry which was decimated by the shut down.  Still a huge challenge to get back to pre-Wuhan ChiCom Chinese virus.  Will still be over 10M unemployed at the end of the year but headed in the right direction.  And the unemployment rate fell to 13% despite all the prognosticators predicting it would be 20%.  Let the wailing and gnashing of teeth begin.

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	HUMM............
Date:	6/5/2020 7:47:42 PM (updated 6/5/2020 7:49:51 PM)

No wailing or gnashing of teeth (good news is good news regardless of who is in the WH) and not making any claims.....but it is interesting to look back and recall how many on this forum who like clockwork accused the Obama admisistration of ''cooking the books'' everytime any good economic news appeared between 2009 and 2016.

Hypocrisy by any other name still stinks!

Name:	wix -	Reply
Subject:	ARCH-IJITT.........
Date:	6/5/2020 9:15:04 PM

Go down a couple of threads and give us your liberal, expert excuse for “Anti-Hydroxychloroquine Study Retracted”.  

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	HUMM...Typical for WIX...
Date:	6/6/2020 10:43:00 AM (updated 6/6/2020 10:43:45 AM)

the poster ''child'' of hypocrisy to fail to stick to the subject...but to address your change of subject, the article on Hydroxychloriquine was pulled because of a question of the methods and reporting regimen, not because the conclusions were considered or proved incorrect.  The vast majority of scientific and medical opinion is that this drug is generally ineffective in preventing or curing COVID 19 and that the small extent it is effective is far outweighed by harmful effects including higher death rates among those COVID patients using it compared with those not.  Now, this is the truth of the matter whether you like it or not!  Now go relax with your first Lysol and tonic of the day and perhaps even ''relieve'' yourself while admiring your Trump pin-ups!!

Name:	wix -	Reply
Subject:	Dance, DANCE....ARCH-IDIOT
Date:	6/6/2020 3:09:34 PM

You are the one offering the “proof”.....now the proof is as BS as you are.........Time to go hide under yo bed again!!

Name:	Lifer -	Reply
Subject:	YOU said it
Date:	6/6/2020 6:49:54 PM

Now find the evidence to prove it and post a link the appriate study.  Maybe, dumbass, it is because it was given to the sickest of the sick only in the begining so naturally a higher death rate.  But for ONCE at least provide a link to PROVE what you say.  

Name:	MrHodja -	Reply
Subject:	HUMM...Typical for WIX...
Date:	6/6/2020 7:27:59 PM

Prove your statement "The vast majority of scientific and medical opinion is that this drug is generally ineffective in preventing or curing COVID 19 and that the small extent it is effective is far outweighed by harmful effects including higher death rates among those COVID patients using it compared with those not."  Give us references.  Give us quotes.  Really tired of your continuing broad general statements of what you call facts without backing them up with hard evidence.  Define "vast majority".  How do you know it is a vast majority?  Enlighten us ignorant lemings.

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	The proof is known because
Date:	6/7/2020 10:50:34 AM (updated 6/7/2020 11:04:17 AM)

I can read Mr H. So can you...start with the May 29 NYT*

*You are smart enough (I hope) to not shout the WIXian and Trumpian BS about the New York Times being ''fake news'' or the ''lamestream media''!

Name:	MrHodja -	Reply
Subject:	The proof is known because
Date:	6/7/2020 1:45:48 PM

Sorry to burst your bubble but I do not consider the NYT a credible source unless it cites fact from a credible source, nor do I conider myself to be "like" anyone else on this forum.  I think for myself and thus if you want me to believe what you say back it up.

Telling me that I can read and to see a paper that was published on a certain date does not come close to you justifying your statement. 

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	The proof is known because
Date:	6/7/2020 5:56:08 PM

Hodja, you are like WIX and Shortbus...a free thinker. LOL

Name:	MrHodja -	Reply
Subject:	The proof is known because
Date:	6/7/2020 6:14:17 PM

I suspect the only similarities between me and those two is we post on the Off-Topic forum and have utter disdain for the current liberal leadership and their despicable tactics. 

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	The proof is known because
Date:	6/7/2020 11:01:06 PM (updated 6/7/2020 11:02:55 PM)

Do you ever discuss your "utter disdain for the current liberal leadership and their despicable tactics" with those liberals in your extended family?