Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	Strong Defense Coming Your Way
Date:	3/24/2021 12:55:21 PM (updated 3/24/2021 1:00:32 PM)

Sidney Powell is a hero to many Trumpsters for her strange arguments on behalf of Trump and the election results. She is being sued by Dominion and here is a statement from her attorney in her defense....looks like a strong defense. 

Her attorney released this brillant statement... 

"No reasonable person would believe that her false claims and conspiracy theories about the 2020 election were "truly statements of fact.""

It's funny or pathetic but Trump believed her. The conman was conned.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Strong Defense Coming Your Way
Date:	3/24/2021 12:58:23 PM

Think you forgot something, but thats not all that unusual for you.

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	Strong Defense Coming Your Way
Date:	3/24/2021 1:02:40 PM

Like what Pepe??????

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	You can't be that dumb can you?!?!?
Date:	3/24/2021 1:18:18 PM

Wait......don't answer that......we already know the answer.  Even the slanted govt media didn't put out this false claim but I'm not surprised that you did.  You need to get back on your meds Goofy.  Nowhere and at no time did her attorneys say any such thing.  What you are parroting, incorrectly I might add, is from media reports.  But at least even they got it closer to the truth than you did.  Just so you know where Goofball got this from folks, here is the actual statement in the news articles with my emphasis added.

Lawyers for pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell said that "no reasonable person" would believe that her false claims and conspiracy theories about the 2020 election were "truly statements of fact."  

So what her lawyer actually said was that no reasonable person would believe that her claims were statements of fact.  A sound and reasonable legal argument for a dismissal.  What Goofy did, and even the slanted media was not that dishonest, was to put quotations around the entire statement.  The reality is that the writer of the news article added the language between "no reasonable person" and "truly statements of fact" with the editorial opinion that the claims were false and were conspiracy theories.  

No reasonable person would be dumb enough to think that they can fundamentally change a sentence in a news article and get away with it......and then there's Goofy.  So tell us Goofy, are you dumb or were you lying about what her lawyer stated?  There is no other choice.  You either intentionally changed this to a quote from her attorney, in which case you are a liar, or you stupidly parroted someone that did without even bothering to check, in which case you are dumb to think you could get away with it. 

One would think after all these years you might know better but the older you get the more deranged and dishonest or addle brained you get.

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	Dumb as dumb can be dude....
Date:	3/24/2021 1:46:49 PM (updated 3/24/2021 1:48:17 PM)

First, I put the double quotes not the media since I was quoting the article. If that is incorrect than I was wrong. But, I always understood if you took a quote from a source you used quotes around the entire quote. Guess you know more that I do on the that issue. 

It was quoted because it is from a court filing.

Are you now defending Powell? That is a big change for you.

Here is the article from what I consider a reliable source...

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/23/pro-trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-election-theft-claims-not-statements-of-fact.html

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	Weak as weak could be.....
Date:	3/24/2021 1:56:31 PM

If you had done what you claimed the quote would have been as follows.

"Lawyers for pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell said that "no reasonable person" would believe that her false conspiracies about the 2020 election were "truly statements of fact.""  Someone had to remove the interior quotes.  Was it you Goofy?

As for Sydney Powell I will say the same thing I said when she was making these claims, she either has the goods or is crazy to make them as it will kill her reputation.  Since not one court case has been decided on the merits I have no idea which is the case.  But as Jonathon Turley, liberal law professor, rightly pointed out this is a very sound and logical argument to make for dismissal of the lawsuit.  It literally has zero to do with the merits of her case and is a tactical argument.

Whether she can deliver on her claims remains to be seen.  One would think she would relish discovery but as someone that has been through discovery knows, it is by far the most expensive aspect of litigation.  Mike Lindell may have the financial resources to pay for discovery and Powell may not.  I don't know and neither do you.

So an honest, sane person would simply delete the original post and save themselves the humiliation.  But noooooo.....Goofy has to double down with some lame excuse.  So who removed the interior quotes Goofy?  Who made the claim that this was what Powell's attorneys said?  Grab a mirror if you need help with the answer.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Strong Defense Coming Your Way
Date:	3/24/2021 2:40:09 PM (updated 3/24/2021 3:26:12 PM)

All the rest you added after I commented.  

as your post stopped with this 1 paragraph - dont lie

Sidney Powell is a hero to many Trumpsters for her strange arguments on behalf of Trump and the election results. She is being sued by Dominion and here is a statement from her attorney in her defense....looks like a strong defense. 

Name:	wix -	Reply
Subject:	GOOF-IDIOT
Date:	3/24/2021 6:44:38 PM

Ya dun been nailed, yet again!!  News fo’ ya.  Your best bet, Robbie, is to find another forum to defend your worthless cohorts on....

Name:	Shortbus -	Reply
Subject:	Strong Defense Coming Your Way
Date:	3/25/2021 9:45:39 AM

https://www.brighteon.com/84bfe0af-4666-4b16-b71f-f0f201ad9ad6