(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
4,311 messages
Updated 1/15/2024 10:58:34 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,600 messages
Updated 4/24/2024 10:58:24 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
126 messages
Updated 12/23/2022 9:21:15 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
Name: |
InjunJohn
-
|
|
Subject: |
APCO Feisty
|
Date:
|
7/27/2007 3:42:45 PM
|
Looks like I ticked off the powers that be at Alabama Power Company! I asked if Lay got preferential treatment due to several executives owning property there. It went like this...
Lay Lake is a "run of the river" lake meaning that it is not operated like Logan Martin which is a "storage lake." Logan Martin fluctuates roughly 5 feet each year. It is drawn down for flood control which normally is in the winter and spring. The lake is filled in the late spring and then that "storage" is used to generate power and meet downstream flow requirements.
This year, because of the drought, we did have to draw Logan Martin in April/May to meet requirements related to the snail flow at Jordan. We also drew Lay, Mitchell, and Jordan to meet downstream flow requirements.
The operation of our lakes has nothing to do with who lives on them.
_____________________________________________________
Bobbie J. Knight Vice President - Public Relations Alabama Power Company Phone: 205-257-1437 Fax: 205-257-2159 Cell: 205-907-4176
-----Original Message----- From: John Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 1:46 PM To: Knight, Bobbie (PR) Subject: Water Levels
Why is it that Lay Lake seems to only fluctuate marginally and stays within a half a foot of full pool, while Logan Martin has been down an average of 3 1/2 feet all year? Could it be that APCO executives own property on Lay Lake? If not, what is the justification to draw down the others while seemingly not affecting Lay?
John
|
Name: |
CAT BOAT
-
|
|
Subject: |
APCO Feisty
|
Date:
|
7/27/2007 10:26:52 PM
|
APCO is full of it. When we meet again at your lake. I will share some info that I have. They are more interested in getting boats like ours off the lake, than they are anything I believe. They are spending pile's of money on a lawsuit just because they can. That is all I will say on this forum. It is not the boat/size/speed/etc. it is the operator.
URL: Dollars for APCO
|
Name: |
CAT BOAT
-
|
|
Subject: |
APCO Feisty
|
Date:
|
7/27/2007 10:28:52 PM
|
One more.....
URL: Just standing up for what is right.
|
Name: |
InjunJohn
-
|
|
Subject: |
APCO Feisty
|
Date:
|
7/27/2007 10:45:54 PM
|
I agree about that. The state didn't mind collecting the sales tax on your boats ( or anybody elses) & they don't seem to mind taxing the profit your company makes by modifying them...
|
Name: |
CAT BOAT
-
|
|
Subject: |
APCO Feisty
|
Date:
|
7/28/2007 8:18:06 AM
|
What a great statement. I could'nt agree with you more.
|
|
|