9/13/2016 11:45:44 AM (updated 9/13/2016 12:02:36 PM)
It is not whether a poster is biased one way or the other or whether a public comment (and Morell is not the only past security related official to express such concern) about a candidate's words come from a biased source or even whether a candidate is telling the truth or "making up" what he sensed or interpreted in a security briefing. The point is ANY candidate that says ANYTHING about a security briefing other than to acknowledge having had one, is crossing a line he or she has almost certainly been instructed not to cross!! What would the Trumpistas have said in 2008 if Obama had made a similar comment about what he sensed about the spook's attitude toward W?