(Lake Martin Specific)
111,175 messages
Updated 6/3/2024 3:29:51 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,647 messages
Updated 6/3/2024 8:27:48 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,195 messages
Updated 5/31/2024 4:36:53 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,171 messages
Updated 5/29/2024 10:51:34 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
I also am factual in my posts. I challenge you to find any post I have made that is not. I have in the past posted erroneous info, but also corrected it as soon as I came to know it to be incorrect.
Once again, as I read the 'charges' it all stems from heavy rainfall and infiltration or seepage of outside water into the system. Several measures have already been done to correct these issues. To the best of my memory, redleg started this conversation when someone posted about a film in Sandy Creek. He stated then it was due to drought and decreased water flow. I have not seen him cite ANY facts, backed up by test data that says ANY of the contaminant levels are above acceptable guidelines so far. And once again, when they get there, without any more rain than we are getting, they will increase downstream flows to correct the problem. Then everyone can go back to complaining about water levels.
|
|