Off-Topic: But
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
4,314 messages
Updated 5/23/2024 1:39:01 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,647 messages
Updated 6/3/2024 8:27:48 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,195 messages
Updated 5/31/2024 4:36:53 AM
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
126 messages
Updated 12/23/2022 9:21:15 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Logan Martin Lake Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   GoneFishin The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   But
Date:   12/27/2010 9:56:42 PM

For SS, I suspect any change will effect those 50 and younger or will be phased in very gradually. When SS was first started under Roosevelt, the average lifespan was less than it is now and a higher percentage of those covered died before normal retirement age 65. The assumptions have dramatically changed as those covered live longer. They are trying to compensate by raising the age. The problem is many people can't physically continue to age 69. So, there will be more collecting under the diasbilty provision for a few years until they reach whatever the new retirement age becomes.
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Could You Be The Author of This Letter? - lotowner - 12/27/2010 8:09:33 PM
     LET ME TRY - GoneFishin - 12/27/2010 8:38:09 PM
          But - Talullahhound - 12/27/2010 8:54:47 PM
               But - GoneFishin - 12/27/2010 9:56:42 PM
                    But - Yankee06 - 12/28/2010 12:04:54 AM
                         But - muddauber - 12/28/2010 8:34:26 AM



Quick Links
Logan Martin Lake News
Logan Martin Lake Photos
Logan Martin Lake Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LoganMartin.info
THE LOGAN MARTIN LAKE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal