(Lake Tuscaloosa Specific)
11 messages
Updated 11/6/2023 3:02:24 AM
Lakes Online Forum
84,070 messages
Updated 10/30/2024 8:48:25 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Lake Tuscaloosa Specific)
6 messages
Updated 6/30/2008 7:08:16 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Barneget
-
|
Subject:
|
Many Who Oppose
|
Date:
|
8/21/2010 10:23:35 AM
|
|
GF, your thoughts almost hit the target, but landed on the wall to the left.
"Many who oppose fall into a greed category ....I have coverage so why do I really care??????? "
Your opening line is probably the most accurate. Many who oppose are paying their own way, many who oppose recognize there are costs associated with most EVERYTHING, many who oppose make responsible decisions related to providing necessities as it relates to the health and welfare of their families, many who oppose, when faced with deciding whether to pay for healthcare or say entertainment (e,g, movies, sporting events, cable tv, cell phones and accessories, twenny fo's) will choose paying for healthcare. As for pre-existing, most group plans had a 1 year wait before costs associated with the condition would be covered. I do have coverage, I do care about my portion of the expense asociated with uninsured. I really care that the new law was sold as a cure for my concern, yet does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to address that, and, along the way, through ridiculous business regulation, adds great expense to every American consumer. So yes, as a producer, I guess I fall into the greed category, greedy bass tard might be even more accurate.
|
|