Name:   MartiniMan - Subject:   What are you talking about? Date:   11/19/2019 4:07:48 PM

Lt. Col Vindman either lied today or on October 29th when he said he didn't know who the weaseleaker was.  What is apparent from his testimony is the following:  1) he was butthurt that Trump didn't follow his approach to Ukraine; 2) he was repeatedly called out for leaking which is a violation of UCMJ; and 3) he was the source to the weaseleaker and actively participated in an attempted coup.  In other news he indicated that he was offered the position of defense minister for Ukraine three times.  Does anyone else find that weird and unsettling that a senior member of our military and one holding high level security clearances was seen so favorably by a wildly corrupt foreign country that they offered him a very senior defense position?  That strikes me as incredibly odd but maybe its not uncommon.  Most of the commentariat seem equally shocked at this revelation.