Off-Topic: FALSE
(Coffeeville Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
83,630 messages
Updated 5/22/2024 10:56:34 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Coffeeville Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Coffeeville Lake Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   MythBuster The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   FALSE
Date:   1/9/2008 12:25:29 PM

"Regardless of the amount of time involved, the discovery of a "missing" period of time remains implausible. If the sun had indeed stood still for a day a few millennia ago, we would have no way of determining that fact through astronomic observations today. We have no frame of reference, no "cosmic calendar" or "master clock" to check against to see if we're overdrawn at the Bank of Time. The concept described here would be like giving someone a non-functioning clock and asking him to determine how much time had elapsed since the clock had stopped running. One could note the positions of the hands on the dial and make a reasonable guess about what the time of day was when the clock stopped running, but without knowing whether that time was A.M. or P.M., and without knowing the calendar date on which stoppage occurred, one could not possibly make any reasonable estimate about how long ago the clock stopped.

Even the putative reasons offered for the scientists' performing the calculations described in this legend make little sense. We need not know about any "missing time" in the past in order to be able to launch spacecraft today. Even if the sun really did once stand still for a day, that would have absolutely no effect on where the sun, the moon, or the other planets are going to be one hundred or one thousand years from now. If we put a new battery in our stopped clock, all we have to do to get it back on track is to set it to the correct time — we don't need to determine how much time the clock "lost" while it wasn't running to be assured that it will display the correct time in the future.

Although the notion of a "lost day" in time has been circulating for well over a century, the version cited here — the one that has been bedevilling NASA since the 1960s — achieved pre-eminence through the tireless efforts of Mr. Harold Hill, who was indeed both a real person and the President of the Curtis Engine Company. However, he had no real connection to NASA, he was not a "consultant in the space program," and he did not witness the events described. Mr. Hill heard a "lost day" legend that had been circulating for many years, embellished it with some details about NASA scientists, and delighted in repeating it when speaking before school groups. His version of the legend made its way into various church bulletins and was eventually picked up and spread by the mainstream media as well, and he devoted a whole chapter to it in his 1974 book, How to Live Like a King’s Kid. (This book lent additional credibility to his tenuous NASA connections — and thus to the legend itself — when he stated that he "was involved [in the space program] from the start, through contractual arrangements with my company." His "involvement" was merely that the Curtis Engine Company had a contract with NASA to service electrical generators.) Even Hill's admission that he hadn't actually witnessed the events he described clearly wasn't intended to dissuade anyone from believing in the literal truthfulness of his story: "[M]y inability to furnish documentation of the 'Missing day' incident in no way detracts from its authenticity."

Authenticity matters little, though — our willingness to accept legends depends far more upon their expression of concepts we want to believe than upon their plausibility. If the sun once really did stand still for a day, the best evidence we'd have for proving it would be the accounts of people who saw it happen. That is what the Bible is said to offer. Some of us accept that, and some of us don't."


URL: Just the facts
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
The Truth and only the Truth - SeaRayMan - 1/9/2008 11:03:01 AM
     FALSE - MythBuster - 1/9/2008 12:25:29 PM
          MUSIC MAN - Kizma Anuice - 1/10/2008 7:24:18 AM
               MUSIC MAN - LifeTime Laker - 1/10/2008 11:19:26 AM
          FALSE - CAT BOAT - 1/10/2008 10:42:21 AM
          FALSE - Lakeman - 1/10/2008 11:19:58 AM
               FALSE - CAT BOAT - 1/10/2008 11:23:55 AM
                    FALSE - Lakeman - 1/10/2008 11:35:15 AM
               FALSE - pi11pipe - 1/10/2008 12:18:28 PM
                    FALSE - farmboy - 1/10/2008 2:39:51 PM
                         FALSE - Feb - 1/10/2008 2:44:39 PM
                              FALSE - farmboy - 1/10/2008 3:13:54 PM
                    FALSE - Lakeman - 1/10/2008 6:45:56 PM
                         FALSE - pi11pipe - 1/11/2008 12:53:21 AM
                              FALSE - Lakeman - 1/11/2008 8:16:54 PM
               FALSE - NautiMinded - 1/11/2008 12:01:10 AM
                    Yep, - Feb - 1/11/2008 8:39:07 AM



Quick Links
Coffeeville Lake News
Coffeeville Lake Photos
Coffeeville Lake Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
Coffeeville.USLakes.info
THE COFFEEVILLE LAKE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal