Name:   MartiniMan - Subject:   You mean real vaccines? Date:   1/31/2022 3:18:38 PM

Wix, sometimes it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.  I have had Covid and as the CDC recently stated in a peer reviewd study I have much better, longer lasting protection from the ChiCom virus than those that are quadruple vaxxed. And because I had the foresight and intelligence to use effective treatment protocols I had minor symptoms and only lost a few hours of work over the two weeks I had symptoms.  Of course I knew the risk going in and concluded that I was under age 65 and in very good health so my risk was very limited......and as usual I was 100% correct.

But as I have said repeatedly, and will repeat because you literally have the mental agility of a small soap dish, the faux vaccines do indeed provide protection against serious symptoms and may be appropriate for those over age 65 and with one or more comorbidities. That they do not protect against infection, something I have stated for a long, long time, is now a widely accepted scientific fact......so factual that the CDC had to change the definition of vaccine to make the experimental gene therapies fit.  That you lack the intellectual bandwidth to discern why some people may logically conclude that the risk of the vaccines outweighs the risk of infection is not a credit to you or those that think like you.  Bless your heart!