Off-Topic: Supreme Court Nominee
(Shores Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
83,686 messages
Updated 6/19/2024 3:46:15 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,198 messages
Updated 6/19/2024 3:45:44 AM
(Shores Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,170 messages
Updated 6/10/2024 6:29:37 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,978 messages
Updated 6/18/2024 10:06:11 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Shores Lake Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Talullahhound The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   Supreme Court Nominee
Date:   5/12/2010 7:56:23 PM

I would think that they would be far more interested in the fact that she has no judicial experience than her sexual preference.
I don't think it is that unusual for the WH to try to carefully craft the image of their SC nominee.

Frankly, I don't know what I think about her. I suspect that there are a lot of well qualified women on the bench. I don't like it when they try to stack the SC based on certain gender or age or political leaning. I'd rather they just look for the best qualified candidate.
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Supreme Court Nominee - lotowner - 5/12/2010 8:16:45 AM
     Supreme Court Nominee - Yankee06 - 5/12/2010 6:21:46 PM
          Supreme Court Nominee - Talullahhound - 5/12/2010 7:56:23 PM
               Supreme Court Nominee - water_watcher - 5/12/2010 9:09:46 PM
                    Supreme Court Nominee - GoneFishin - 5/12/2010 11:18:24 PM
                         Supreme Court Nominee - MartiniMan - 5/13/2010 3:15:58 PM
               Supreme Court Nominee - MartiniMan - 5/13/2010 5:00:38 PM



Quick Links
Shores Lake News
Shores Lake Photos
Shores Lake Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
Shores.LakesOnline.com
THE SHORES LAKE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal