Lake Berkley Topics: 483'
(Lake Berkley Specific)
1 messages
Updated 2/16/2011
Lakes Online Forum
83,688 messages
Updated 6/21/2024 9:58:42 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,198 messages
Updated 6/19/2024 3:45:44 AM
(Lake Berkley Specific)
1 messages
Updated 2/16/2011
Lakes Online Forum
4,170 messages
Updated 6/10/2024 6:29:37 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,978 messages
Updated 6/18/2024 10:06:11 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Lake Berkley Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   lakngulf The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   483'
Date:   12/1/2013 1:05:43 PM (updated 12/1/2013 1:17:09 PM)

No, not a short memory at all.  I said all along that I had mixed emotions about the possible change.  But watching my grandkids play pirate ship, etc on the floating dock during Thanksgiving was a vote for the current plan.  I am in favor of 483, but the arguments for more boating and waterside businesses does not hunt.  Having the 483 as February starting point would be beneficial.   BTW, I offered a reply to the FERC license discussion "in favor" of 483.

But water level is determined more by weather than by license.
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
483' - lakngulf - 11/27/2013 9:40:17 AM
     483' - p.c. - 11/27/2013 1:42:47 PM
     483' - MythBuster - 11/29/2013 11:28:24 AM
     483' - Osms - 12/1/2013 10:52:04 AM
          483' - lakngulf - 12/1/2013 1:05:43 PM



Quick Links
Lake Berkley News
Lake Berkley Photos
Lake Berkley Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
Berkley.LakesOnline.com
THE LAKE BERKLEY WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal