Name:   CRD - Subject:   Wow Date:   3/26/2020 5:20:14 PM

Gee Archie, lets not speak out of both sides of our mouth.  A few threads ago when discussing the H1N1 pandemic, you were comfortable with the Obama/Biden response; 14k deaths caused by the H1N1 was not "extremely" deadly in your words (despite those deaths occuring in the young and middle age populations). Using your logic, I could accept 107K deaths because had Trump not acted when he did, we could have been looking at 1mil.   Since we probably won't reach that mortality number that you warned about, is this virus also "not extremely deadly"?  Just trying to sort out your cut-off point for what you might call extemely deadly and what you accept as nuisance mortality.