(Lake Cumberland Specific)
3 messages
Updated 11/14/2023 9:05:47 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,683 messages
Updated 6/18/2024 10:47:51 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,197 messages
Updated 6/10/2024 5:39:11 AM
(Lake Cumberland Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,170 messages
Updated 6/10/2024 6:29:37 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,978 messages
Updated 6/18/2024 10:06:11 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
GoneFishin
- 
|
|
Subject:
|
The Martini Truth Detector has arrived....
|
|
Date:
|
6/16/2010 11:59:51 AM
|
|
Most homes are owned jointly. Assuming your wife’s parents owned it jointly, each owed 1/2. Since her dad owned 1/2, her mom inherited his half on a stepped up cost basis. The cost was $10,500 allocated to each of them (1/2 of $21,000) and the market value at time of her dad’s passing for his 50% was $175,000 (1/2 of $350,000). The new cost basis for the 1/2 in her dad’s name was $164,500 ($175,000-$10,500).
Her mom’s new cost basis was $175,000 (her $10,500+$164,500). Based on the sale of the house, her profit for tax purposes was $175,000 ($350,000-her new cost basis of $175,000). Since she was a widow, her exemption from tax would be $250,000 which is greater than the $175,000 so there would be NO tax.
If a tax was paid then you guys need a new accountant.
“So after 2011 almost one quarter of the profit from a home sale goes to pay taxes.” Rather misleading when you use the word profit. Profit AFTER the $250,000 or $500,000 exclusion and any step up basis.
So Martini, as usual, only told part of the story and engaged in conservative fact manipulation.
Cheers.
|
|
Reply
Back
Search
Off-Topic Forum
»
Kentucky Lakes
»
Lake Cumberland
Login
|
Home
