Off-Topic: Wikileaks

Lake D'Arbonne Topics

(Lake D'Arbonne Specific)

4 messages

Updated 2/24/2018 7:55:51 AM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,657 messages

Updated 6/7/2024 2:07:21 PM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,196 messages

Updated 6/5/2024 11:03:19 PM

Lake D'Arbonne Fishing

(Lake D'Arbonne Specific)

0 messages

Updated

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,169 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,261 messages

Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,976 messages

Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	comrade
	Subject:	Wikileaks
	Date:	10/24/2010 11:53:21 AM

So back to the question: do you think that a disgruntled employee of the US government made this information available with intent to hurt the US government/military, and did so in an independent fashion (that is, without regard to the governing Party)? Or did a third party, with a more focused agenda, direct the availability of the information?
Sounds like Tallulahound would vote for number 1, and dismiss number 2. Correct?