Off-Topic: You assume a lot GF....much that you can't know

Scarborough Topics

(Scarborough Specific)

0 messages

Updated

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,973 messages

Updated 9/21/2024 8:44:42 AM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,204 messages

Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM

Scarborough Fishing

(Scarborough Specific)

0 messages

Updated

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,172 messages

Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,261 messages

Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,979 messages

Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	GoneFishin -
	Subject:	You assume a lot GF....much that you can't know
	Date:	6/16/2010 1:50:50 PM

Why use an example that leaves the impression there was a tax?

If her mom always owned the house then under current law it was always subject to the tax over a profit of $250,000. The additional tax of 3.8% amounts to an additional $3,002 on a profit of $329,000 after the $250,000.

I operate on the basis when I sell property or stock at a profit that the buyer paid my tax. I just forward it to the IRS. Otherwise, the tendency is to hold on to avoid a tax and be subject to a falling marketplace as we have seen the past 2 years.

I fail to understand your middle class argument. The sale of your primary residence at a profit is a capital gain like any other investment. However, you can deduct either $250,000 or $500,000 from the profit. Seems quite clear.

It is so surprising that someone who is such an asute businessman would have so little knowledge about her business affairs. I guess she doesn't trust a conservative.