Off-Topic: Rachel Mitchell's conclusion
(Stockton Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
83,671 messages
Updated 6/13/2024 8:32:40 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,197 messages
Updated 6/10/2024 5:39:11 AM
(Stockton Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,170 messages
Updated 6/10/2024 6:29:37 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,977 messages
Updated 6/10/2024 6:30:23 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Stockton Lake Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Talullahhound The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   Rachel Mitchell's conclusion
Date:   9/28/2018 10:32:58 AM

Watched the whole thing yesterday and I don't know why the media (and liberals) are so compelled to beliveve the woman.  I felt that all those calls by the Committee for Kavanaugh to ask the WH for an FBI investigation were patently ridiculous and designed to make Kavanaugh look bad when he wouldn't do it. As was pointed out yesterday, there is no satute of limitations on his "crime", so why didn't she just file criminal charges?  "civic duty" my a$$.

Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Rachel Mitchell's conclusion - MartiniMan - 9/28/2018 9:02:48 AM
     Rachel Mitchell's conclusion - au67 - 9/28/2018 10:17:13 AM
          Rachel Mitchell's conclusion - Talullahhound - 9/28/2018 10:32:58 AM
               Rachel Mitchell's conclusion - Moldyoldy - 9/28/2018 10:50:25 AM
               Rachel Mitchell's conclusion - MartiniMan - 9/28/2018 11:14:45 AM
                    Rachel Mitchell's conclusion - phil - 9/28/2018 12:03:42 PM
                    [Message deleted by author] - phil - 9/28/2018 12:03:43 PM



Quick Links
Stockton Lake News
Stockton Lake Photos
Stockton Lake Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
Stockton.USLakes.info
THE STOCKTON LAKE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal