Off-Topic: I respectively disagree MM

Lake Martin Topics

(Lake Martin Specific)

111,141 messages

Updated 4/24/2024 4:29:25 PM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,601 messages

Updated 4/25/2024 12:17:41 AM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,193 messages

Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM

Lake Martin Fishing

(Lake Martin Specific)

4,169 messages

Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,169 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,260 messages

Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,976 messages

Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM

Lake Martin SCUBA

(Lake Martin Specific)

169 messages

Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	Lifer -
	Subject:	I respectively disagree MM
	Date:	1/15/2010 3:42:19 PM

But ONLY with your statement the Coakley still wins. I think (hope beyond hope) that Brown wins. Apparently some high ranking dems are all but writing it off at this point. Even her internal polls are showing her loosing by as much as five points.

Here is my prediction. Brown sqeaks out a victory, but not by a large enough margin to prevent the desparite dems from filing a contest to the election. Then the post election politics plays out in the dems favor, it is after all Taxachsetts, contorlled by dems for a century or more. Then the 'playing' of the system begins in order to keep it tied up so that the dems can refuse to seat him, 'till the courts have settled the matter'. They can't just slow play it now that that cat is out of the bag, but there is 'precedent' for not seating a winner as long as it is in court battles. Remember the Stuart Smalley debacle in MN.

Here is a link to an excellent article on her plunging numbers.

URL: Bottom-has-fallen-out-of-Coakleys-poll-numbers