Off-Topic: Are We Surprised?
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
4,311 messages
Updated 1/15/2024 10:58:34 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,605 messages
Updated 4/25/2024 9:33:24 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
126 messages
Updated 12/23/2022 9:21:15 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Logan Martin Lake Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Talullahhound The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   Are We Surprised?
Date:   1/16/2011 10:10:17 AM


I struggle with this.  On one hand, I totally agree with you.  But, I also have a nagging feeling that our moral convictions of the past were something of a smokescreen.  Is it morally better to be forced into a marriage because of pregnancy?  Or to have pregnancy hidden away (ie.sending pregnant teenagers off to a home for unwed mothers and forcing adoption?) Or to stay in a marriage that is really bad, perhaps abusive, for the sake of not getting a divorce?  I struggle with this.

I do definitely agree that people do give up on the marriages and exchange partners like it is of no consequence.  It's a lot of work to have a good marriage and one has to take the hard times with the good times.  Part of it is that so many women have their own income and an amount of financial independence, people no longer see a reason to tough it out.  Particuliarly with the advent of "no fault" divorces. 

With regard to the out of wedlock births, people used to get married at a much younger age.  There was a time when women married routinely at age 16-18.  The majority of people didn't go to college, so they married younger. That took care of the raging hormone problem. 

And then there is that sex is out there.  On TV, movies, you can't pick up a magazine without seeing an article about sexy or sex.  (something you would never have seen in my Grandmother's McCalls or Ladies Home Journal). 
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Are We Surprised? - lotowner - 1/14/2011 4:52:00 PM
     Are We Surprised? - Talullahhound - 1/14/2011 5:32:29 PM
          Are We Surprised? - MAJ USA RET - 1/14/2011 6:06:57 PM
               Are We Surprised? - Talullahhound - 1/14/2011 9:31:56 PM
          Are We Surprised? - MartiniMan - 1/14/2011 6:17:12 PM
               Two Parts To The Story - GoneFishin - 1/14/2011 8:34:04 PM
               Are We Surprised? - Talullahhound - 1/14/2011 9:30:59 PM
                    Well?? - alahusker - 1/14/2011 9:50:18 PM
                         Well?? - Talullahhound - 1/15/2011 5:35:32 PM
                    Are We Surprised? - MartiniMan - 1/15/2011 7:51:51 AM
     Are We Surprised? - Tall Cotton - 1/14/2011 11:20:34 PM
          Are We Surprised? - Talullahhound - 1/15/2011 5:38:19 PM
               Are We Surprised? - MartiniMan - 1/15/2011 10:05:31 PM
                    Are We Surprised? - MrHodja - 1/15/2011 10:37:23 PM
                         If My People - MAJ USA RET - 1/16/2011 10:09:56 AM
                         Are We Surprised? - Talullahhound - 1/16/2011 10:10:17 AM
                              Are We Surprised? - MAJ USA RET - 1/16/2011 10:36:10 AM



Quick Links
Logan Martin Lake News
Logan Martin Lake Photos
Logan Martin Lake Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LoganMartin.info
THE LOGAN MARTIN LAKE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal