Off-Topic: And so on
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,142 messages
Updated 4/25/2024 2:43:12 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,603 messages
Updated 4/25/2024 7:59:26 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,169 messages
Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Lake Martin Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   MartiniMan The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   And so on
Date:   8/8/2012 5:11:12 PM

It was not his parents that refuted the story, it was his sister and she said her brother, with whom she was close, never mentioned the alleged hazing and would have resented these tactics and the story. I agree it is a silly thing to bring up but your guy's team brought it up and it is but one of many examples of the campaign TOTUS is running. Fact is, they lied that Romeny hazed the guy because he was gay. That was a lie.

As for your continued insistence that Harry is telling the truth I am going to end this once and for all in very clear terms. Romney has released his tax returns from 2010-2011 in which he paid taxes in both years. Really, this is not hard. You see, this is 2012. The last 10 years would go from 2002 to 2012. In the two years of tax returns that he has released, which fall within "the last 10 years", he has provided written documentation that he paid taxes. Harry Reid is lying. Period, end of report. Don't you trust the Washington Post?!?!? I am truly shocked.

As for your strange interpretation of what the Messiah did in his exec order I will provide a quote from ABC News.

“After the Obama administration announced this week that it is opening up waivers to states from the work requirements contained in welfare reform........., .”

You see GF, without the waiver in the Exec Order no state could do this because that was the intent of the law passed in a bipartisan fashion and signed by Slick Willie. Now if you want to argue that he isn't responsible for the ultimate outcome of what he did then we need to revisit all your criticisms of GOP Presidents. I mean, it wasn't their fault that people did what they allowed to happen. Just be honest GF, what Obama did will allow for a critical component of welfare reform to be changed and had he not done so it would not have happened because it would have violated federal law. He is responsible regardless of the circumstances.

And from Democrat Mickey Kraus comes the following:

"A great deal of effort was put into defining what qualified as work, and making sure that work actually meant work and not the various BS activities (including BS training activities) the welfare bureaucracies often preferred to substitute for work. . . . But of course the work requirements were part of what sent that general ‘signal.’ . . .
To the extent the administration’s action erodes the actual and perceived toughness of the work requirements, which it does, it sends the opposite and wrong signal."

I suppose they are all wrong and you are right about this issue.

I await your apology and retraction...............
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Is Romney up to Chicago-style politics? - MartiniMan - 8/8/2012 12:24:44 PM
     Is Romney up to Chicago-style politics? - GoneFishin - 8/8/2012 2:07:07 PM
          Reply to your reply - MartiniMan - 8/8/2012 3:08:57 PM
               Reply to your reply - Barneget - 8/8/2012 3:43:09 PM
                    Reply to your reply - MartiniMan - 8/8/2012 3:57:40 PM
                         Reply to your reply - GoneFishin - 8/8/2012 4:00:59 PM
                              Reply to your reply to my reply - GoneFishin - 8/8/2012 4:16:33 PM
                                   And so on - MartiniMan - 8/8/2012 5:11:12 PM
                                   BTW - MartiniMan - 8/8/2012 6:32:58 PM
                              Maybe, maybe not.... - Barneget - 8/8/2012 5:09:56 PM
                                   MM You are correct - GoneFishin - 8/8/2012 7:47:51 PM
                                        MM You are correct - comrade - 8/8/2012 10:06:59 PM
                                        MM You are correct - MartiniMan - 8/9/2012 9:39:18 AM
     Details emerge on Reid's source...then not - MartiniMan - 8/10/2012 9:10:32 AM
          Back To Your Original Question - GoneFishin - 8/10/2012 11:27:40 AM
               It was either/or question - MartiniMan - 8/10/2012 12:07:44 PM
                    It was either/or question - GoneFishin - 8/11/2012 12:49:36 AM
          [Message deleted by author] - GoneFishin - 8/10/2012 11:27:40 AM



Quick Links
Lake Martin News
Lake Martin Photos
Lake Martin Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LakeMartin.com
THE LAKE MARTIN WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal