Off-Topic: That was no loyalty pledge
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,140 messages
Updated 4/24/2024 4:28:20 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,600 messages
Updated 4/24/2024 10:58:24 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,169 messages
Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
MartiniMan
-
|
Subject:
|
That was no loyalty pledge
|
Date:
|
9/8/2015 2:56:57 PM
|
|
Don't know where you read that but all they signed was a pledge not to run as a third party candidate. Doesn't mean they have to vote for the eventual nominee or anything else. But even if it were there is a big difference between the GOP asking a candidate to pledge something and a candidate asking someone to pledge to vote for them as a precondition to getting into a campaign event.
As for the IT guy, let's use a little critical thinking here. What is worse, helping Hillary set up a private unsecured server that contained top secret information or not reporting a little income? If you think he pled the 5th as a result of the latter and nothing to do with the former then I can't help you. On the scale of criminal activity his setting up this server is far more serious. Time will tell if others follow his wise move or if they decide to take the fall for Hillary. Either way she broke the law and a grand jury should be empaneled and she should be indicted. Whether she will is probably more a matter of back room deals than following the law, something this current administration has little propensity to do.
|
|