Name:   Talullahhound - Subject:   So the bipartisan commission was wrong? Date:   11/24/2015 10:53:34 AM (updated 11/24/2015 10:54:57 AM)

I really feel sorry for you MM.  I'm merely suggesting that the report that got published may have been adjusted or edited during its staffing process and final approval.  There may have been intelligence source reasons that they did not want certain information included, there may have been political negotiations to leave certain things out.  You are so cynical about all things government, you're willingness to accept this report as comprehensive astounds me.. or does your skepticism only apply when it is the Obama Administration. 

It's clear to me that you have no idea how government really works, except as it pertains to the EPA.  You are sadly uninformed.  And I am not the only person who knows this.  Sadly, I am the only one on the Lake Martin 'off topic" forum who was working for the USDP when all this was going on.  And yes, I actually do know some people who were likely interviewed by the Commission.  To what extent they opened up to all they knew, I don't know.  But people tend to be very, very careful about providing information to Commissions, Congressional Committees, etc., especially when they hope to keep their jobs, lest they end up like Valerie Plame, whose only sin was to be married to a former Ambassador who dared dispute the Administrations claims in a public forum.I

But I guess I ought to thank you for your compliment on my arrogance, since I think you wrote the book on arrogance and have set the bar pretty high for arrogance around here.