Name:   Talullahhound - Subject:   SAP's .......... from a former SAP manager Date:   3/16/2016 5:29:42 PM

Things that could be too classifid to release may only be Confidential,  secret or TS, any of which could case some level of harm to U.S. national security.    I believe what the retired Army manager said is true, but I believe he committed a security violation even saying what he said.  Which is why I don't want to talk about this any more. 

I believe that I have read that there was classified info on her server, but I also thought I read that it wasn't marked as such and only upon further review did they determine it was such.  And yes, Hodja is right, she was responsible to ascetain that she was not getting classified information on her server.  The telling thing is that apparently there was an email exchange where she told her staff to take off the markings and send it to her.  Clearly, she did things she should not have done.  I guess none of this shocks me because I have heard people over the years play fast and loose with classified information.  I even had an SES boss when I was on the Army Staff, go out in a public forum and discuss a classified program.  Defense News happened to be there and reported what he said and he was given the option to be fired or to quit, but he prosecuted or fined and he was no where close to the statue of a Secretary of State. 

From a political perspective, the WH is not going to let the DOJ prosecute her, because she is really their only hope for the election.  And if they didn't allow her to run, who coud they put in?