Lake Martin Topics: Simple answer
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,139 messages
Updated 4/21/2024 6:43:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,594 messages
Updated 4/20/2024 12:08:27 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,169 messages
Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Lake Martin Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Lifer The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   Simple answer
Date:   12/22/2016 2:09:37 AM

Someone in 1923,or there about, someone screwed up by on foot. It was subsequently discovered but ignored for decades. With the new license this year APCO was required to change and use the correct 491 in all reporting. The scientific community has done so for decades. So there will be a few years of confusion amongst some old timers but then everyone will be on the same level.

As for FEMA, good luck. The flood of 1979 and the subsequent modifications/additions to the dam changed the physical dynamics of the lake. It has been explained in detail several times in the forum. If you search 1979 flood and/or "coffer dam" I think you will understand better after reading those posts. In typical government fashion it just took them a few decades to catch up with the reality of the new flood plain. If your rate is in the thousands I assume you  use very close to waters edge in a high risk zone and are probably fighting a loosing battle. Just speculating here but it seems like maybe this is the first time the place has sold/refinanced and never needed flood insurance before and folks are freaking out trying to figure out why. But that is just ramblings of an old tired brain. Hope this helps you understand. You are certainly not the first to be confused over the numbers recently.

Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Lake level - GC - 12/21/2016 7:34:09 PM
     Lake level - GoneFishin - 12/21/2016 8:05:15 PM
          Lake level - lakngulf - 12/21/2016 8:33:42 PM
               Lake level - GC - 12/21/2016 8:53:49 PM
                    Simple answer - Lifer - 12/22/2016 2:09:37 AM
                         Simple answer - GC - 12/22/2016 8:29:28 AM
                              Simple answer - Lifer - 12/22/2016 12:16:50 PM
     Lake level - Mack - 12/21/2016 8:50:47 PM
          Lake level - GC - 12/21/2016 8:55:11 PM
               Lake level - GC - 12/21/2016 9:04:21 PM
                    Lake level - Mack - 12/22/2016 10:57:00 AM
                         Lake level - JTenn - 12/23/2016 12:55:50 PM



Quick Links
Lake Martin News
Lake Martin Photos
Lake Martin Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LakeMartin.com
THE LAKE MARTIN WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal