Name:   phil - Subject:   with better formatting - Date:   5/24/2017 12:18:39 PM (updated 5/24/2017 12:21:03 PM)

Just copied and pasted it from a PC :)

If he does and I would be shocked since he has isses with longer posts and reading comprehension, and if he does he will notice a misspelling in the 2nd paragraph and use it to discredit the entire post.

I had stumbled across it myself over the weekend and had looked it over before WIX posted it - gotta love internet news sources.

As for Comeys ties to the Clintons they are well documented - he should never have been involved with a Clinton investigation, his presence alone calls the investivation into question, which as it explains is probably by design so as to taint the investigation and if it ever went to trial it would probably be thrown out.

It explains a lot and fills in lots of gaps.  It explains why everyone being investigated got immunity and that evidence was allowed or ordered to be destroyed and that Hillary was never put under oath. It is hard to reopen a case when you can not prosecute anyone and evidence was destroyed.  I still wonder how that works with the destuction of documents that were required to be retained under FOIA.