Grilling & Recipes: St. Louis Cut vs. Baby Back ribs??
(Bankhead Lake Specific)
3 messages
Updated 2/8/2012 8:19:41 PM
Lakes Online Forum
59,345 messages
Updated 3/24/2019 11:20:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,970 messages
Updated 1/3/2019 8:31:06 AM
(Bankhead Lake Specific)
0 messages
Lakes Online Forum
3,897 messages
Updated 3/24/2019 9:46:30 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,165 messages
Updated 3/16/2019 10:41:51 PM
Lakes Online Forum
2,910 messages
Updated 11/27/2018 1:44:10 PM
Lakes Online Forum
74 messages
Updated 10/8/2018 12:30:30 PM
Bankhead Lake Photo Gallery

Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Tall Cotton The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   St. Louis Cut vs. Baby Back ribs??
Date:   6/14/2017 9:06:39 AM

I don't do ribs as often as I would like, but when I do, they are baby backs. There's just something about the St Louis style and them not being as uniform in shape. Also, you tend to get more gristle in the St Louis. I think you're correct about the amount of meat between bones. Since the St Louis are from farther down the ribs have spread a little. Either way, cooked properly they are both a tasty meal!

So do you remove the membrane from the back, or leave it on? If you remove it, what method do you use?

Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
St. Louis Cut vs. Baby Back ribs?? - Mack - 6/12/2017 8:04:06 PM
     St. Louis Cut vs. Baby Back ribs?? - Tall Cotton - 6/14/2017 9:06:39 AM
          Membrane - Mack - 6/14/2017 5:35:16 PM
               Membrane - Tall Cotton - 6/15/2017 10:06:26 AM
                    Membrane - Mack - 6/15/2017 11:53:44 AM
                         Membrane - Little Talisi - 6/16/2017 11:26:26 AM
                              Membrane - Mack - 6/17/2017 9:50:33 AM

Quick Links
Bankhead Lake News
Bankhead Lake Photos
Bankhead Lake Videos

About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us

Copyright 2019, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal