The revelation raises questions about whether the DNC could have done more to limit the damage done by hackers suspected of working for Russian intelligence.

The DNC brought in consultants from the private security firm CrowdStrike in April. And by the time suspected Russian hackers were kicked out of the DNC network in June, the hackers had been inside for about a year.

 

someone had been inside their network for a year and when warned.. the DNC shrugged its shoulders and said well its a nothing burger, nothing to see move along, were not worried.  And CrowdStrike prefessionals were unable to stop the Russians for up to two months.

 

 

The October statement

About a month before the U.S. election, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security issued an unusual public statement.

“The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations,” the statement read. “The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process.”

 

So again - the DNC "hack" and probably Podesta.  Podesta gave out his "password" and the DNC knew for months that their system was compromised, but still fail to see the connection to our election.

The government analysis

well again just talking about the hack at the DNC.

 

wait something down around mid page

The report mentions briefly that state elections systems were also targeted by the Russians, a point also made in the October report.

The leaked NSA report

In June, the Intercept published a document leaked to them from an employee of the NSA that provided classified analysis of those voting system intrusions.

“Russian military intelligence executed a cyberattack on at least one U.S. voting software supplier and sent spear-phishing emails to more than 100 local election officials just days before last November’s presidential election,” the Intercept’s report said, detailing the NSA’s analysis supporting that claim. It noted, though, that the analysis represents only one point of evidence to the charges it presents and that the document does not include the raw intelligence supporting the claims. That said, it comports with what was released publicly by the intelligence agencies.

 

So your evidence so far is that the DNC knows nothing of IT security, Podesta is an idiot and through a leaked NSA report one US voting software supplier was cyberattacked and some emails were sent to election officals but no information as to if anyone was stupid enough to give out their username and passwords to voting systems.

 

and to finish out your "evidence"

What evidence that might be is not clear, assuming it exists.

but, it was Russia, and they had to prefer Trump over Hillary, and that is why he won - Because Russians.

 

Your link to evidence as proof of Russian tampering is as void of facts as you are.

 

I could just as easily post this one 

https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/wikileaks-cia-umbrage-russia-dnc-hack/

WikiLeaks tweeted that this collection of malware must be used by the CIA to conduct “false flag” attacks because the borrowed code would contain “fingerprints” pointing forensic investigators towards the code’s creator rather than the CIA itself.

so lets just send that dog a huntin and come up with something just as possible as your "evidence"  

 

Obama realizing that Hillary was going to lose the election decided to have the CIA hack the DNC to plant the narrative that it was the Russians.  The CIA used known Russian tools and methods, was intentionally sloppy to get caught( which apparently according to your website they failed at so badly with outsiders having access to several dozen computers on any day for months to years.  The DNC and the Whitehouse in advanced decided to have a third part verify the "hack" signatures knowning it would show it had Russian fingerprints and further their own agenda in attempting to get the election overturned or provide a distraction for months/years to stop his agenda from being rolled back.

 

Based on what we know from Wikileaks Vault 7 this is just as plausable, but the only real evidence of anything in your link to the washingon compost is that the DNC need a new IT staff, or maybe not so the American people can read more about lies, collusion, primary fixing and other things that you idiots accept as "democratic"

Its one thing to miss an intrusion, its another to continue to miss it after being warned that it is actually going on, because at that point you either dont care its happening or you are allowing it to happen for some other reason.

 

Now since the Department of Homeland Security attempted access into election systems in Georgia, Indiana, Idaho and other states in the days leading up to the election we have to make a few other conclusions.  

Since the states noticed who was attempting to gain access they are much better at IT then the DNC since appearently the attempts to comprmise those states were unsuccessful, and that Russians are so much further ahead in regards to hacking then the CIA/DHS/Federal Government that they are able to compromise systems for months and years while bypassing security while the DNC was aware of it and may or may not have attempted to stop it but the Russians are just so good they just could not be stopped by the DNC with knowledge it happening.  All of this while the Obama Whitehouse, intelligence agencies, NSA and Susan Rice were completly helpless to stop the attack on democracy.

 

So in closing you are saying that the "crime and attack on the election" that occured on Obama's watch is a nothing burger and a dog that dont hunt, but the fact that Trump is not investigating the Russian attack on the fabric of America, after Obama watched the crime happen, is a real crime and Trump should be investigated for obstruction and collusion, by your lack of logic Obama should be charged as an accessory to the crime.