Name:   MartiniMan - Subject:   Alfrankenperv's resignation - tip of the iceberg Date:   12/7/2017 1:29:35 PM (updated 12/7/2017 2:11:07 PM)

Please re-read what I wrote.  I would vote for Moore (if I could....but I can't) for the simple reason that the resignation of Alfrankenperv clears the way for the Senate to remove Moore if they so desire and then the Guv can replace him with a Republican. Absent the duplicity of the media in waiting until he was the nominee to release this information, we would not even be talking about Moore because he wouldn't have won the primary.  Does anyone think that Strange or another less compromised candidate would lose to Jones?  Sessions won with over 90% of the vote.  This entire mess was manufactured by the real leader of the Demcrat party, the govt media complex.  Rewarding them for this is a mistake.

But my comment about draining the swamp was bipartisan in nature.  Hence, my question about why the GOP Rep that used the slush fund was still there.  I don't care about which party is impacted.  But I ask you, do you really believe these Democrats would take such a principled stand if the Governor of the states that Conyers and Franken represents were a Republican?  I don't and if the shoe were on the other foot I don't think the GOP would either.  Besides, what exactly are the Democrats giving up by forcing Conyers and Franken to resign?  Answer?  Nothing, zip, zero, nada........meanwhile many in the stupid party are doing the opposite and will sacrifice a Senate seat by opposing Moore.  Such is politics but the Dems deserve no praise for what they are doing.