Off-Topic: Rachel Mitchell's conclusion
(Lake Tuscaloosa Specific)
11 messages
Updated 11/6/2023 3:02:24 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,586 messages
Updated 4/16/2024 12:46:32 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Tuscaloosa Specific)
6 messages
Updated 6/30/2008 7:08:16 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Lake Tuscaloosa Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   MartiniMan The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   Rachel Mitchell's conclusion
Date:   9/28/2018 11:14:45 AM

I really liked how Cruz handled that one with his questions of Grassley.  Had Feinsten not withheld the information, had she shared it in private with the committee so they could investigaste it over 2 months ago when there was time there would have been no need to the last minute FBI investigation.  And they could have done so without forcing Ford to have to go through this testimony.  They didn;t because any reasonable person would conclude that her story not only lacked a shred of corroboration, it was openly and clearly refuted by the others she claims were there.  This was yet another delay tactic and was so transparent.  And people keep saying he refused the FBI investigation.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  He told the committee he would do whatever they wanted.  It's their job to order this, not his, and if they really wanted one they have had over 2 months to ask for one.

But more to the point, all the FBI will do is ask questions and provide the results to the committee.  The very same questions Democrats could have asked BK yesterday.  And we have the sworn testimony of the other three people that were supposedly there, all of whom deny it.  Their only reason for getting Judge in front of them is so they can try to destroy a man who suffered from alcoholism and is a cancer survivor.  Their fixation on the yearbook was so retarded it's almost beyond belief.  What matters more, some sophomoric nonsense in a yearbook about drinking beer and farting or all the evidence of his life during high school and since then?  Someone as evil as he was being depicted is in no way going to alter their behavior all of the sudden, if at all.

Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Rachel Mitchell's conclusion - MartiniMan - 9/28/2018 9:02:48 AM
     Rachel Mitchell's conclusion - au67 - 9/28/2018 10:17:13 AM
          Rachel Mitchell's conclusion - Talullahhound - 9/28/2018 10:32:58 AM
               Rachel Mitchell's conclusion - Moldyoldy - 9/28/2018 10:50:25 AM
               Rachel Mitchell's conclusion - MartiniMan - 9/28/2018 11:14:45 AM
                    Rachel Mitchell's conclusion - phil - 9/28/2018 12:03:42 PM
                    [Message deleted by author] - phil - 9/28/2018 12:03:43 PM



Quick Links
Lake Tuscaloosa News
Lake Tuscaloosa Photos
Lake Tuscaloosa Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LakeTuscaloosa.info
THE LAKE TUSCALOOSA WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal