Off-Topic: Rachel Mitchell's conclusion
(Bankhead Lake Specific)
3 messages
Updated 2/8/2012 8:19:41 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,547 messages
Updated 3/28/2024 10:36:37 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,192 messages
Updated 3/26/2024 6:58:12 AM
(Bankhead Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,168 messages
Updated 2/23/2024 10:21:00 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
97 messages
Updated 6/7/2023 10:50:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
phil
-
|
Subject:
|
Rachel Mitchell's conclusion
|
Date:
|
9/28/2018 12:03:42 PM
|
|
Because the majority member told them no to the FBI so they wanted Kavanaugh to go around him and demand one which is a bucket of chit anyway.
All I can say is I hope when/if the repukes are out of the majority that they stick it to them demonrats by their new set standards from now own. They will literally have to find saints for any and all offices, all congressional members who have a sexual anything in their background other then signed and noterized sexual consent form per encounter ( including married couples ) because a marriage certificate does not mean she lost her right to say no.
|
|