Off-Topic: Rachel Mitchell's conclusion
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
4,311 messages
Updated 1/15/2024 10:58:34 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,586 messages
Updated 4/16/2024 12:46:32 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
126 messages
Updated 12/23/2022 9:21:15 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
phil
-
|
Subject:
|
Rachel Mitchell's conclusion
|
Date:
|
9/28/2018 12:03:42 PM
|
|
Because the majority member told them no to the FBI so they wanted Kavanaugh to go around him and demand one which is a bucket of chit anyway.
All I can say is I hope when/if the repukes are out of the majority that they stick it to them demonrats by their new set standards from now own. They will literally have to find saints for any and all offices, all congressional members who have a sexual anything in their background other then signed and noterized sexual consent form per encounter ( including married couples ) because a marriage certificate does not mean she lost her right to say no.
|
|