You missed highlighting this in the passage you quote, just as you've self-servingly missed Mueller's obvious conclusions.

"Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. "  ITS NOT HIS JOB TO CLEAR HIM, IT IS HIS JOB TO ESTABLISH GUILT  What part of this is so hard for you to understand?

I'm a grownup, so I'll translate into philspeak: we did not establish the innocence of the President.  Let me transate into stupid so you can understand -  did not realize that it was the job of the prosecutor to establish innocence - that is completly against civil rights, due process and basically everything in America. It his his damn job to establish GUILT.  Is this concept hard for you?

So, claims by Individual 1 and his mouthpiece Bill Barr that the report "completely exonerates" him are nothing but baldfaced lies. IT DOES NOT ESTABLISH GUILT, IN THE USA YOU ARE INNOCENT until proven guilty. 

Oh, and here are some more choice passages from Mueller:

"while the OLC opinion concludes that a sitting President may not be prosecuted, it recognizes that a criminal investigation during the President's term is permissible.3 The OLC opinion also recognizes that a President does not have immunity after he leaves office."  AND THEY CAN TAKE HIM TO COURT IN ABOUT 6 YEARS IF THEY THINK THEY CAN PROSECUTE(which I bet they will not), OR THEY CAN IMPEACH TODAY!!!!! ( FYI PELOSI CAN START PROCEEDINGS ANY TIME SHE WANTS, which will guarantee the 2nd term.

"Given those considerations, the facts known to us, and the strong public interest in safeguarding the integrity of the criminal justice system, we conducted a thorough factual investigation in order to preserve the evidence when memories were fresh and documentary materials were available."

Tell me exactly why, other than to prosecute Individual 1 after he leaves office, would there be any need to preserve evidence.  I agree that evidence needs to be preserved - but do you have any problems with Hillary deleteing emails under subponea, taking hammers to phones?  I am going to guess you did not have a problem with the bleachbit preservation of records and her use of unsecure email system to avoid FOIA and records requirements.  

And further tell me why Individual 1 is so obsessed with preventing Mueller, Don McGahn, et at, from testifying if Mueller's investigation "completely exonerates" him.  The better question may be now that Mueller Gate / Steele Gate is starting to come apart lets us borrow a favorite Democrat line as of late "What do they have to hide by an having a investigation.:

We both know you know the answers to the above. And we both know you will not be truthful in any answers you might try to offer....

And we both know that you are more full of it then the Thanksgiving Goose as well as how you will not be truthful in any answers you might try to offer.