Name:   MartiniMan - Subject:   Here are a few examples to ponder Date:   10/31/2019 10:21:02 PM

You need to read the weaselblower report and compare it to the transcript.  There was a lot more missing than one sentence from what was in the report.  Here are just three glaring errors although there are many more.

The complaint accuses the president of requesting that Zelensky "locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cybersecurity firm Crowdstrike”

But that never happened.   Read the transcript and you'll see one short reference to Crowdstrike and no request for the server.

The complaint accuses the president of urging Zelensky to hold onto then-Ukrainian Prosecutor-General Yuriy Lutsenko, who was later ousted from his post on Aug. 19.

But that also never happened.

The complaint stated that President Trump explicitely threatened funding if they didn't investigate the Bidens.

But that also never happened.  Maybe someone could convey this threat in a single sentence but I doubt it.  Had he threatened their funding I can assure you it would have generated a response from Zelensky.  Maybe the threat and the response could be done in a single sentence but I seriously doubt it.

There is simply no way all those could have happened in a single sentence nor could that specific content have been magically absent from the transcript due to faulty software.  The complaint claimed people were on the call that weren't.  He stated that it was classified secret even though no classified information was in it.  That was false as it included Zelensky criticizing other foreign leaders which would always make it classified. 

Face it Hound, there is simply no way to blame faulty software for the discrepencies, especially since it completely comports with what all but two witnesses have stated happened.  Including Morrison who claimed the transcript was accurate, there was no pressure, no quid pro qou and no illegalities whatsoever.  I seriously do not understand why you are choosing to believe two people over the half dozen, including Zelensky, that have a completely different recollection of the call and which are all consistent with the transcript.  Especially knowing what we know about the ones that have a different version of the call.  As for the ellipticals, they designate an incomplete sentence and the beginning of a new thought, not a bunch of missing text.  It's fanciful thinking at best to try to fill in entire sentences in the place of the ellipticals but that's what they did even though it made no sense.