Name:   MartiniMan - Subject:   Latest transcript another blow to the narrative Date:   11/15/2019 1:09:12 PM

Credible about what?  She was gone before the call.  She has absolutely nothing to add other than she didn't agree with Trump's approach toward Ukraine or what Guiliani was doing.  And she is complaining about the fact that she served at the behest of the President and he chose to fire her.  This is an HR issue and has zero to do with anything else.  And remember, this is the woman who according to leaked testimony claimed Trump and Zelensky bashed her in their first call.....which we now know was false.  I get you don't like Guiliani or his involvement but this so-called "witness" is witness to nothing relevant to impeachment and is whining about being fired.  Like Taylor and Kent, most reasonable Americans will look at her testimony and rightly conclude that she is an aggrieved former employee that didn't like the fact that the President fulfilling his constitutional aurthority to hire and fire political appointees negatively impacted her.  She is there to get people all emotional that Trump was a meanie for firing her.....as if that has anything to do with impeachment.