Off-Topic: Response from Rueters
(Nolin River Lake Specific)
2 messages
Updated 6/24/2009 2:03:36 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,543 messages
Updated 3/26/2024 11:33:26 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,192 messages
Updated 3/26/2024 6:58:12 AM
(Nolin River Lake Specific)
1 messages
Updated 2/18/2007 6:33:51 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,168 messages
Updated 2/23/2024 10:21:00 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
97 messages
Updated 6/7/2023 10:50:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
phil
-
|
Subject:
|
Response from Rueters
|
Date:
|
11/27/2019 2:40:17 PM (updated 11/27/2019 2:46:34 PM)
|
|
You are saying that based on the information that MM posted that based on the site you posted in #1 should have ind sampled at a much higher rate - thanks for proving MM right.
#4 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-polls/how-the-polls-including-ours-missed-trumps-victory-idUSKBN1343O6 imagine that MM posts about one post and you post someone elses poll to claim that he was incorrect.
Rule of thumb is never trust polls good or bad - they are too easily weighted or worded to be used to move opinions not report where the populace is actually at.
|
|