Name:   phil - Subject:   Response from Rueters Date:   11/27/2019 2:40:17 PM (updated 11/27/2019 2:46:34 PM)

You are saying that based on the information that MM posted that based on the site you posted in #1 should have ind sampled at a much higher rate - thanks for proving MM right.

 #4 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-polls/how-the-polls-including-ours-missed-trumps-victory-idUSKBN1343O6 imagine that MM posts about one post and you post someone elses poll to claim that he was incorrect.

Rule of thumb is never trust polls good or bad - they are too easily weighted or worded to be used to move opinions not report where the populace is actually at.