Name:   architect - Subject:   Hey CRD Date:   12/31/2020 10:01:20 PM (updated 12/31/2020 10:12:00 PM)

You are the one who made the suggestion of the +/-75% income loss being the determinant as to whether someone was worthy of relief.  Your very equating the whole scenario to the goodness of an employer show your tendancy toward snobbery.  If someone has had a 76% loss of income it is very very unlikely it is because his or her employer has cut their wages 76%.  It is much more likely that the employer has had to fire them through no fault of their own and they have been working odd jobs to maintain whatever income they can but under your plan if they slip up an make a few dollars too much you would say ''tough'' no soup for you!

In the real world anybody that assumes their contributions to what they decide to be good causes is likely to be triple the income of someone else they have never met could be assumed to be a little too proud of themself...namely a snob.  I suspect you have very little idea as to what is going on in the demographic of this nation that will never have the opportunity like you and me to be able to retreat and decompress at a second lake or beach home.  They are trying too hard to be able to stay in their first home.