Off-Topic: Which is it?
(Sardis Lake Specific)
14 messages
Updated 6/12/2021 10:41:52 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,605 messages
Updated 4/25/2024 9:33:24 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Sardis Lake Specific)
4 messages
Updated 3/25/2010 6:02:17 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Sardis Lake Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Lifer The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   Which is it?
Date:   10/10/2022 10:05:04 AM

Democrats have claimed for decades now that a fetus is nothing more than a "clump of cells" and has no feelings and isn't even really life until ir passes through the birth canal, and is some cases up to 30 days after.  Now the great scholar Stacey Abrams, you know the Govenor of GA, declares we really don't even know "when a pregnancy truely begins".  What courage it took for her to stand up against a couple of hundred years of "modern" science and litterally thousand of years of animal husbandry to declare such a thing.  She alone screams the emperor has no clothes.

Interestingly at about the same time some brilliant psychologist now proclaims that the "clump of cells" in the birthing persons womb is spending its time contemplating its gender and the complexities of gender identity while it awaits its trip though the birthing canal.  Just damn.  

Sheer utter lunacy from these people.  This is what passes as educated people these days and their drivel is given serious consideration in some circles, unfortunately for us it is sometimes in the cirlces that matter.  This is especiallly true in education.  

So as the headline asks; which is it?  Is it the clump of non life containg cells deservng of no consideration to their excistance other than the conveinence of the birthing person, or, is it a concious, sentient being that is so developed that it can consider such deep phillosphical questions as gender identity and it's conflicts with gender expresion in todays society.

How stupid do they think we are?  

To me it is obviuosly somewhere in between these extremes.  Exactly where I can't say which is why I stay out of every argument about abortion and right to life issues enter very few discussions on the issue, but reading about this idiot Profeessor/phsychologist was just to much.  I do not consider myself completely with the Pro-lifers, nor the abortion on demand up to birth.  Let's just say I am pro-fetus, even if you call it a clump of cells.  I almost always support the underdog and the way I see it, the fetus is the underdog here, it can't defend itself.

Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Which is it? - Lifer - 10/10/2022 10:05:04 AM
     Which is it? - phil - 10/10/2022 12:38:56 PM
          Which is it? - CranBob - 10/10/2022 8:15:43 PM
               Which is it? - phil - 10/11/2022 8:48:12 AM



Quick Links
Sardis Lake News
Sardis Lake Photos
Sardis Lake Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
Sardis.USLakes.info
THE SARDIS LAKE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal