Lake Naomi Topics: Boating Bill Editorial Comment
(Lake Naomi Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
83,605 messages
Updated 4/25/2024 9:33:24 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Naomi Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Lake Naomi Photo Gallery
    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Osms The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   Boating Bill Editorial Comment
Date:   4/14/2006 8:11:53 AM

Great post Carnac. Maverick's proposal has a basic flaw. His law would require thousands of Marine Police to patrol the waters 24/7. The anti-law group probably would like this law because they know the State could not fund such an army of troops.

Can you imagine ticketing a boater because his wake was 2'2" instead of the 1'8" allowed by Maverick's law. The wake is gone so how do you measure it?

I feel certain the legislature considered the factors the Maverick raised, but they all require more Police. The way the bill is written does not require more Police, judges, court rooms, etc.
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Boating Bill Editorial Comment - Maverick - 4/14/2006 2:18:42 AM
     Boating Bill Editorial Comment - Carnac - 4/14/2006 5:02:41 AM
          Boating Bill Editorial Comment - Osms - 4/14/2006 8:11:53 AM
               OSMS - Maverick - 4/14/2006 12:44:32 PM
                    response to Maverick 2d - Osms - 4/14/2006 1:16:36 PM
                         response to Maverick 2d - Osms - 4/14/2006 1:25:29 PM
                              Thanks OSMS - Maverick - 4/14/2006 2:17:13 PM
                                   Thanks OSMS - Osms - 4/14/2006 4:00:21 PM
                                        Actually - Ulysses E. McGill - 4/15/2006 1:44:35 PM
                    A couple of questions... - WSMS - 4/14/2006 1:49:38 PM
                         WSMS - Maverick - 4/14/2006 2:13:30 PM
                         WSMS - Your Response ??? - Maverick - 4/15/2006 12:15:38 PM
                              WSMS - Your Response ??? - WSMS - 4/17/2006 7:30:52 PM
          Boating Bill Editorial Comment - Maverick - 4/14/2006 12:22:15 PM
               It isn't the end - Carnac - 4/14/2006 5:57:10 PM
                    It isn't the end - Maverick - 4/14/2006 7:30:44 PM
                         I think I heard on ch. 12.... - Osms - 4/14/2006 7:44:47 PM
                              I think I heard on ch. 12.... - BoatsRFun - 4/14/2006 9:30:39 PM
                         That's accurate - Carnac - 4/15/2006 8:14:37 AM
                              WSMS - Maverick - 4/15/2006 12:14:22 PM
                                   Sorry Meant Carnac Above - Maverick - 4/15/2006 12:17:25 PM
     Boating Bill Editorial Comment - LifeTime Laker - 4/14/2006 8:09:35 AM
          Boating Bill Editorial Comment - Maverick - 4/14/2006 12:45:45 PM
          Boating Bill Editorial Comment - eli - 4/14/2006 11:21:19 PM
     Boating Bill Editorial Comment - AnchorbayDon - 4/14/2006 9:22:09 AM
          Boating Bill Editorial Comment - luvlake - 4/14/2006 10:47:36 AM
          Boating Bill Editorial Comment - Maverick - 4/14/2006 12:48:44 PM
     Boating Bill Editorial Comment - eli - 4/14/2006 11:04:44 PM


Quick Links
Lake Naomi News
Lake Naomi Photos
Lake Naomi Videos



About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
Naomi.LakesOnline.com
THE LAKE NAOMI WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal