Lake Martin Topics: PLOT BY SANDY CREEK RESIDENTS

Lake Martin Topics

(Lake Martin Specific)

111,142 messages

Updated 4/25/2024 2:43:12 AM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,602 messages

Updated 4/25/2024 2:40:42 AM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,193 messages

Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM

Lake Martin Fishing

(Lake Martin Specific)

4,169 messages

Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,169 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,260 messages

Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,976 messages

Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM

Lake Martin SCUBA

(Lake Martin Specific)

169 messages

Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	Kizma Anuice -
	Subject:	PLOT BY SANDY CREEK RESIDENTS
	Date:	9/16/2007 12:22:05 AM

I am not saying that the cities should not comply with the law. I am in favor of them so doing.

On the other hand, the residents of Sandy Creek moved to the problem. They were able to buy property at a lower price because of the problem.

Now they want the poop pumped al over the county so it won't be in their cheap back yards.

Those of us who paid a premium to be away from the poop pipe should not have to have the problem moved to our baileywick.

Making the poopatrators clean up the poop is fine. Moving it to a new location is not.

And I know all about the new state of the art treatment plant. But even with state of the art facilities, as they say, "Poop hapens"