Off-Topic: QUESTION

Lake Martin Topics

(Lake Martin Specific)

111,136 messages

Updated 4/17/2024 11:03:49 PM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,587 messages

Updated 4/19/2024 12:42:53 PM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,193 messages

Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM

Lake Martin Fishing

(Lake Martin Specific)

4,169 messages

Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,169 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,260 messages

Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,976 messages

Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM

Lake Martin SCUBA

(Lake Martin Specific)

169 messages

Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	jalcz -
	Subject:	QUESTION
	Date:	4/16/2008 1:00:12 PM

I am a Home Owner, Boat Owner, and dues-paying member of HOBO. Is there some rule I missed somewhere that says that because I am a HOBO, and a member of HOBO, that I must be against the ban?

I understand why some are against the ban, and I respect their opinions; anyone who would forfeit a friendship over an issue like this is a friend not worth having anyway. But just as I respect their right to opinion, I would hope they would grant me the same courtesy.

But that's straying from my original question: why should HOBO be FORCED to take one side in this debate? The organization is supposed to represent ALL home-owners and boat-owners on the lake. Even those of us who dare to disagree with you. And in this case, many of us do; that group would say that HOBO is representing our view just fine on this one.