Logan Martin Lake Topics: I am against this as proposed

Logan Martin Lake Topics

(Logan Martin Lake Specific)

4,311 messages

Updated 1/15/2024 10:58:34 AM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,605 messages

Updated 4/25/2024 9:33:24 PM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,193 messages

Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM

Logan Martin Lake Fishing

(Logan Martin Lake Specific)

126 messages

Updated 12/23/2022 9:21:15 AM

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,169 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,260 messages

Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,976 messages

Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	Ulysses E. McGill -
	Subject:	I am against this as proposed
	Date:	4/21/2008 11:16:32 PM

I am however, ALL for MANY more "no wake" zones that "should be" marked by buoys in sloughs....we need several hundred buoy and we need marine police support to place them.

I am for speed limits; I have stated this many times, and I believe it is especially important at night,

That being said, 100 feet is almost impossible to measure on the open water and this is a bad law.....I agree with almost all of the previously posted reasons to oppose this law as written; this is a knee jerk solution to real problems. From an enforcement standpoint, it is way too arbitrary and we don't have realistic enforcement capability. As a deterrent, very few will care and most will be unaware of the law.

If speed limits are posted, and if no wake buoys are placed around the lake where needed, most folks will abide by the rules.....this is a fact that has been proven on many other lakes around the country.