Off-Topic: No Earmarks in Spending Bill
(Claiborne Reservoir Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
83,609 messages
Updated 5/2/2024 5:30:02 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Claiborne Reservoir Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Claiborne Reservoir Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Talullahhound The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   No Earmarks in Spending Bill
Date:   4/12/2009 12:36:56 PM

Well, maybe she has "pork" and "earmarks" confused. There can be "pork" earmarks, but there can also be legitimate earmarks.
We used to get earmarks for providing assistance for counter-drug programs in Latin America. They laid out specific amounts for specific activities and laid out specific parameters about how the money could be used.

Having said that, Does anyone really pay any attention to Pelosi and what she says? She's an idiot.
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
No Earmarks in Spending Bill - water_watcher - 4/12/2009 10:12:31 AM
     No Earmarks in Spending Bill - Talullahhound - 4/12/2009 12:36:56 PM
          No Earmarks in Spending Bill - MrHodja - 4/12/2009 2:17:44 PM
               No Earmarks in Spending Bill - muddauber - 4/12/2009 2:50:27 PM
                    No Earmarks in Spending Bill - Summer Lover - 4/14/2009 9:32:31 AM



Quick Links
Claiborne Reservoir News
Claiborne Reservoir Photos
Claiborne Reservoir Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
Claiborne.LakesOnline.com
THE CLAIBORNE RESERVOIR WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal