Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	COULD MARTINI BE RIGHT???
Date:	3/31/2022 9:53:10 PM (updated 4/1/2022 4:19:02 AM)

Martini maybe on to something....there may have actually been voter fraud. Here is an example from FOX.  Mark Meadows appears to be registered to vote in Virginia and N Carolina. As Martini would say...Go Mark!!!!

https://www.rocketcitynow.com/article/news/nation-world/former-trump-chief-meadows-voter-registration-in-question/507-c860db56-e3a3-4549-a18b-fc28245e6929

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	Forest and trees
Date:	4/1/2022 7:08:15 AM

We can always count on you to miss the forest while you count the leaves on the trees.  Bless your heart.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Forest and trees
Date:	4/1/2022 8:49:01 AM

Funny it says he is registered in two places, but no where in the article did I see that he actually voted in two places or cast any illegal ballots.

So if you own property in two places you are not allowed to register and vote on local issues?

I am suprised he was willing to post this considering how difficult it is on the left to be able to define something as simple as a woman or a voter.  They want felons, illegals, and the dead on the rolls - but god forbid someone register in two states.  

GFY - let me know when they pull his records and prove he actually voted illegally in two places vs this absolute bovine excrement that you and I both know is just written for idiots like you to squeal like a 10 year old pre monthly bleeding person.

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	Goofy is a blind, deaf and dumb ideologue
Date:	4/2/2022 10:32:22 AM

I noticed Goofy has not posted the peer reviewed paper by John Lott about voter fraud.  Funny how he fixates on something that might result in one extra vote for Trump but ignores the hundreds of thousands of fake votes for Dementia Joe in battleground states that likely changed the outcome of the election.  But noooooo......Goofy wants to focus on something that probably never happened.

As for me, I have already concluded the obvious and like Hunter Biden's laptop story, this truth will also come out despite the govt media censorship.....which is why Goofy has probably never heard of Lott's research.

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	Goofy is a blind, deaf and dumb ideologue
Date:	4/2/2022 6:55:00 PM

It is not 1 vote. It is Mark Meadows............ever hear of him? Why has nothing been done with the Lott report? He needs to contact Sidney Powell or Rudy.

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	Goofy is a blind, deaf and dumb ideologue
Date:	4/3/2022 11:58:50 AM

So what?  It is just one vote if in fact he voted twice for which there is zero evidence.  Zip, zero, nada......  You as such a useful idiot for the govt media and Democrats.  You believed them when they lied about Russian collusion.  You believed them when they said Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation.  You believed them when they called the Jan 6th stupidity an insurrection.  You have believed each and every one of their lies.....hence you are the epitome of a useful idiot.  Congrats.

As for Lott's peer reviewed paper I am not in the least surprised you asked such a foolish, naive and downright silly question.  So under the absurd assumption that you really don't know, which is sad beyond belief, I will tell you.  One, the govt media and Big Tech are censoring it just like they censored Biden's pay for play scheme and pretty much anything that goes against their preferred ideology and party.  Two, Congress is run by Democrats who many of which benefited from the fraud directly and all of whom approve because it worked to get rid of Trump.  So none but the crazed would assume a lack of action by Congress on the evidence of mass vote fraud that could have changed the outcome in 2020 means a single thing.  The evidence continues to mount as time goes on and will do so but will change nothing, so dreadful mission accomplished as we all suffer the consequences of Dementia Joe's reign of terror on the American people and the world through senility, stupidity and incompetence.

So Goofy, your original post put you in useful idiot territory and your second paragraph above cemented it.  I would suggest you read Lott's paper but it would be far over your head and even if you managed to understand its implications you would ignore them.  So don't bother unless you want to have your multiple statements that there is zero evidence of fraud in 2020 totally obliterated.  There is so much evidence if you were willing to look.....but you aren't because that's what all useful idiots do.....Democrats can always count you.