Forum Thread

Logan Martin Lake Topics

(Logan Martin Lake Specific)

4,314 messages

Updated 5/23/2024 1:39:01 PM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,644 messages

Updated 5/28/2024 9:14:08 AM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,193 messages

Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM

Logan Martin Lake Fishing

(Logan Martin Lake Specific)

126 messages

Updated 12/23/2022 9:21:15 AM

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,169 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,261 messages

Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,976 messages

Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Name:	au67 -	Reply
Subject:	Copy of APC e-mail
Date:	6/27/2007 5:38:06 PM

Sent on behalf of Willard Bowers

I know many of you are following very closely drought conditions and the impact on lake levels. I am sure there are many rumors circulating. Things are certainly getting worse quicker than better and I felt it would be beneficial to give an update. Many of you may need to take actions based on what may be ahead.
By way of background, in February, based on the developing drought conditions, WE REDUCED THE RELEASES FROM ALL OUR PROJECTS TO THE minimum flow required under our federal operating licenses. At that time we made a request to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to allow us to start filling our storage projects early based on the unprecedented flows we were experiencing. In March we obtained a variance that enabled us to fill our storage projects on the Coosa River. However, the benefit was short-lived and the storage achieved was quickly consumed by the required downstream release at Jordan Dam.
On the Tallapoosa river we were unable to fill our storage projects despite the variance obtained from the Corps. The Tallapoosa system is now being operated in conjunction with the Coosa system to meet the navigation flow at Montgomery, which is 4640 cubic feet per second (cfs). Basically we are releasing 2300 cfs from the Coosa and 2300 from the Tallapoosa to meet this requirement.
Smith Lake never reached full pool despite minimal releases from February to mid May. We recently began releasing water from Smith to meet downstream flow needs including navigation, drinking water and power generation at Gorgas Steam plant.
In May we initiated drawdowns of Lay, Mitchell, Yates, Thurlow and Jordan. These lakes normally do not fluctuate more than a few inches, but the utilization of the limited storage in these lakes was necessary to maintain the required releases in the most effective manner.
The current levels below summer pool are as follows: Harris down 4 feet, Martin down 8 feet, Weiss down 1 1/2 feet, Henry down 1 1/2 feet, Logan Martin down 3 feet, Smith down 5 1/2 feet. Yates, Thurlow, Lay, Mitchell and Jordan are down 2 to 3 feet.
We have requested further relief from the flow requirements based on the worsening conditions. Specifically, we have requested that the Corps reduce flow requirements on the Alabama River and increase water releases from upstream reservoirs in Georgia.
While we continue to seek relief which will balance the upstream and downstream interests, there are parties which want no increase in upstream releases, such as the State of Georgia. Also, there are parties downstream who want no reduction in the minimum flow.
The comment period on the proposal we made to the Corps ended on June 12. We were informed June 15 that the Corps has determined that it will be necessary to do an Environmental Assessment of the proposed action before a decision can be made. We are in the process of responding to that request but cannot predict when a decision will be made regarding any reduction in downstream releases or increase in releases from the upstream reservoirs.
Based on the current circumstances we expect the levels of all our storage projects to continue to fall. Given the current required releases we anticipate projects on the Coosa and Tallapoosa to reach winter pool by July 25th. We anticipate that Smith Lake will be approximately 10 feet below summer pool by August 1.
I have heard feedback that we are favoring some lakes over others. The decisions we are making are with one purpose in mind: to manage the water resources in the most efficient way. We recognize that upstream lakes in Georgia cannot be drained and we recognize that downstream flow requirements cannot be reduced to a level which places undue burden on those downstream interests. Our goal is to balance, as much as possible, all of the various needs.
We will continue to press for relief from the requirements discussed but we all must recognize that lake levels will continue to drop, though at a much slower rate, even if relief is granted. The drought conditions we are seeing are the worst on record and we are attempting to manage them within the constraints that have been placed upon us.
I urge you to monitor our web site at http://www.alabamapower.com/ which has a link to drought lake level information and our 1-800-LAKES11 number.
Thank you for your continued interest and understanding.
Willard Bowers
205-257-4090
wlbowers@southernco.com

Name:	BigFoot -	Reply
Subject:	Copy of APC e-mail
Date:	6/27/2007 6:17:49 PM

Good info!!...Thanks au67....

Name:	raysea -	Reply
Subject:	Copy of APC e-mail
Date:	6/29/2007 10:09:01 AM

au67,

Good information! It helps answer some of the questions that I have. It also confirms that during the early phase of the drought conditions, Lake Martin bore the burden to provide the release of water to the Alabama river.

I am going to visit their website and see what other information is available.

I assume you are an Auburn gradtuate of 1967. I am also. Civil Engineering.

Name:	SandyCreekman -	Reply
Subject:	Conspiracy
Date:	6/29/2007 11:10:22 AM

Yes, some want to create an APCO conspiracy or clain that it's all economics and they have no regard for the boaters, etc. I don't hold that view at all. The releases are all to meet COE downstream requirements. However, I do believe APCO must be pushed hard to stop letting the lake down 10 feet. That is absolutely not needed. Given that we seem to be in long term drought (multiple years back to back), APCO should be working to save us a few feet next winter so we don't repeat this summer where we're unable to use our boats, etc. I believe APCO could get permission to say let the lake down only 6 feet or so if they can make up for it this winter.

Name:	raysea -	Reply
Subject:	Conspiracy
Date:	6/29/2007 11:25:20 AM

I see no conspiracy; however, I do see some untimely mistakes that have been made. As I have stated elsewhere, there are two issues that we should push APCO on in the future: Lessening the winter drawdown and equitable drawdown for all the lakes in the Coosa/Tallapoosa system. Given the severe drought conditions, I think it is irresponsible to have only recently begun a serious drawdown of the Coosa lakes.

I think we can agree on those two issues.

Name:	LifeTime Laker -	Reply
Subject:	I don''t agree
Date:	6/29/2007 1:02:49 PM

I see no mistakes made by APCO. Adn it seems to me that the draw downs have been equitable considering the amount of water in the respective lakes.

Name:	MythBuster -	Reply
Subject:	I don''t agree
Date:	6/29/2007 1:19:44 PM

You might have noticed that one of the concepts that users of this forum have trouble with is the idea of "volume.," as in the volume of different lakes. All that seems to matter to them is acreage (surface area); the depth of the lakes in question is given no consideration.

Name:	raysea -	Reply
Subject:	I don''t agree
Date:	6/29/2007 1:55:10 PM

That is great news!!! That means that most everyone else will agree with me.

Name:	MythBuster -	Reply
Subject:	I don''t agree
Date:	6/29/2007 2:28:46 PM

I'd rather be right than have people who are wrong agree with me. :-)

Name:	raysea -	Reply
Subject:	I don''t agree
Date:	6/29/2007 2:35:32 PM

Me too!! I couldn't have said it better myself. Thanks for the support, even though I know you meant something different.

Name:	LifeTime Laker -	Reply
Subject:	Me too Mythbuster
Date:	6/29/2007 4:06:55 PM

Some of these folks don't have a clue.

Quick Links
Logan Martin Lake News
Logan Martin Lake Photos
Logan Martin Lake Videos