Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	most damaging wikileaks?
Date:	10/28/2016 11:26:31 AM

http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/

Name:	Buteye -	Reply
Subject:	most damaging wikileaks?
Date:	10/28/2016 1:46:40 PM

Great job Phil. This is a listing of 100 situations documenting an almost unbelievable summation of Hillary's lies and scandalous activities over the past few years. It would be a true revelation if every person in the United States could read the information contained in this list.

Name:	Talullahhound -	Reply
Subject:	most damaging wikileaks?
Date:	10/28/2016 7:55:20 PM

I just took 40 minutes and read through all of this in detail (pulling up each reference). None of it really surprises me but I am surprised that so many of these comments were put in writing by anyone.  Broke cardinal rule one - never put in writing anything that you woudn't want to see on the front page of the Washington Post. 

I loved finding out that she knew debate questions in advance, and there is no reason to think that hasn't bee the case for the 3 Presidential debates.  And that she would have to be so completely scripted including being told to smile.  Trump got it right that she is a nasty woman.  Too many sources report her abuse of the Secret Service.

I found that business about her refusing to have the Ambassadors ride in the limo with her.  I'm sure they were ticked off, because that would cause them embarassment in front of the heads of state in other countries that the Ambassador would be expected to deal with on a weekly basis.  If they concluded that he/she did not have the SECSTATE's confidence, the Ambassador would be hamstringed in doing the job he is supposed to do.    Remember how the Chinese dissed Obama by making him deplane from the belly of the plane, and only sent a low level official to greet him?  Well expect more of the same with Hillary